Legal Opinion

Holden v. Holden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1956No. 380PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The appellant in his case on appeal undertakes to set out six assignments of error based on a like number of exceptions. However, the exceptions appear nowhere in the record except under the purported assignments of error. Such exceptions are worthless and will not be considered on appeal. Even so, in the absence of any exceptions, or when exceptions have not been preserved in accord with the requirements of our Rules, the appeal will be taken as an exception to the judgment. Barnette v. Woody, 242 N.C. 424, 88 S.E. 2d 223. Consequently, as pointed out by the appellee, in view of the state of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Vaughan v. . VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Stanley v. . StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Lee v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Hinkle v. HinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API