Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1979No. 99PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

The only assignment of error properly before this Court is whether the absolute divorce granted to defendant bars plaintiff’s right to alimony in this case. Because we find that it does not, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

The defendant correctly points out that a dependent spouse’s right to alimony is controlled by G.S. 50-16.2. He argues that this plaintiff is denied that right because at the time of the award, she was not a “dependent spouse” as defined in G.S. 50-16.1(3) because she was not a spouse. Furthermore, the defendant claims alimony in this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Nowell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. McNeely Ex Rel. McNeely v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Bizzell v. Auto Tire & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Friedland v. GalesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Gore v. Myrtle/MuellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Craver v. Dixie Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Meacham v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API