Legal Opinion
Pat Huval Restaurant & Oyster Bar, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 1, 2012No. Consol. 06-00290PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMAN, Judge:
This action has been consolidated from six cases brought by a group of eight domestic producers of processed crawfish tail meat (collectively, the “Pat Huval Plaintiffs”), 1 Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. (“Koyo”), 2 and SKF USA, Inc. (“SKF”), 3 challenging the constitutionality of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA” or “Byrd Amendment”), and the administration of the statute by Defendants. 4 These cases were consolidated by order of the Court under Consol. Ct. No. 06-00290. (Order (Feb. 23, 2007), ECF No. 91; Order (Mar. 16, 2011), ECF No. 207.)…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Geo Specialty Chemicals, Incorporated v. HusisianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Pat Huval Restaurant & Oyster Bar, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Nan Ya Plastics Corp., Am. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Koyo Corp. of U.S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.