Legal Opinion

Koyo Corp. of U.S.A. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 13, 2013No. Slip Op. 13-32; Court 12-00147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Judge:

This case arose from the actions of two agencies, the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) that denied Plaintiff Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. (“Koyo”) certain monetary benefits under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”), 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-171, § 7601(a), 120 Stat. 4, 154 (Feb. 8, 2006; effective Oct. 1, 2007). 1 The ITC did not include Koyo on a list of parties potentially eligible for “affected domestic producer” (“ADP”) status, which…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
  2. United States v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.United States Court of International Trade · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API