Koyo Corp. of U.S.A. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, Judge:
This case arose from the actions of two agencies, the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) that denied Plaintiff Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. (“Koyo”) certain monetary benefits under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”), 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-171, § 7601(a), 120 Stat. 4, 154 (Feb. 8, 2006; effective Oct. 1, 2007). 1 The ITC did not include Koyo on a list of parties potentially eligible for “affected domestic producer” (“ADP”) status, which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
- United States v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.United States Court of International Trade · 2015