Legal Opinion
Pat Huval Restaurant & Oyster Bar, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 7, 2015No. 2012-1250, 2012-1347PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
This is another in a series of cases challenging the constitutionality of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000, 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a) (2000), known as the CDSOA or “the Byrd Amendment.” We have previously upheld that statute against challenges based on the First Amendment and the equal protection com ponent of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. See SKF USA, Inc. v. U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed.Cir.2009); see also Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United States, Nos. 2013-1304 et al., slip op. at 13-16 (Fed.Cir. Apr. 24, 2015); Ashley…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schaeffler Group USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- United States v. American Home Assurance Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
- United States v. American Home Assurance Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Prysmian Cables & Sys. USA, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025
- Schaeffler Group USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.