Legal Opinion
Nan Ya Plastics Corp., Am. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 12, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-92; Court 08-00138PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Judge:
This case arose from the actions of two agencies, the U.S. International Trade Commission (the “ITC” or the “Commission”) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “CBP”), that denied Plaintiff, Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America (“Nan Ya”), certain monetary benefits under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA” or “Byrd Amendment”), 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.L. 109-171, § 7601(a), 120 Stat. 4, 154 (Feb. 8, 2006; effective Oct. 1, 2007). The ITC did not include Plaintiff on a list of parties…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nan Ya Plastics Corp., Am. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Koyo Corp. of U.S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- DAK America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018