Legal Opinion
Nootka Packing Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 7, 1935No. 3759PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
Merchandise, consisting of minced razor clam meat, in cans,' packed in British Columbia, Canada, was classified by the collector at the port of Seattle, Wash., as “clams * * * packed in airtight containers” and assessed with duty at 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 721 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The importers ’ protested said classification, claiming, inter alia, that the goods were free of duty under paragraph 1761 of said act as shellfish, prepared or preserved. This claim is the only one relied on in this court. From the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Smillie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Schade & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Brennan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
- Neuman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Deckers Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Chevron Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Commercial Aluminum Cookware Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.