Legal Opinion

Ishimitsu v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 14, 1921No. 2094PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeal horn Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 44095.

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise, the classification of which is involved in this case, was described in a report emanating from the appraiser’s office as “a Japanese food product known as 'nori tsukudani.’ This product is the seaweed 'nori’ boiled with shoyu and packed in hermetically sealed tin cans of the net capacity of about 13 ounces.”

This report was incorporated into the record by consent of counsel, was by the board, is by parties here, and by this court regarded as evidence, and aside from the files is the only evidence in the case.

The merchandise was classified by the collector as prepared…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Murphy v. ArnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Rink v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Kleinberger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Cronite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Pacific Iron & Metal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API