Legal Opinion

Atwood-Stone Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 14, 1914No. 1414PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 35531 (T. D. 34440).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Merchandise invoiced as feed or condemned wheat and imported into the United States from Fort William, Canada, was classified as wheat by the collector of customs for the district of Superior, Wis., and assessed for duty at- 25 cents per bushel under the provisions of paragraph 242 of the tariff act of 1909, which paragraph is as follows:

242. Wheat, twenty-five cents per bushel.

The importers protested that the importation was not wheat, but a nonenumerated unmanufactured article dutiable at 10 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph 480 of said act, which reads as follows:

480. That…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Malouf v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. W. P. Devereux Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Farnsworth v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  3. Tower & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  5. Obrecht v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API