Legal Opinion

Kamikawa Bros. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 4, 1927No. 2826PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The material involved in this appeal is known as sake lees, and is a product resulting from the brewing of a Japanese fermented liquor called sake. It was imported March 17, 1922, and was classified for duty by the collector under paragraph 385 of the tariff act of October 3, 1913, as a “manufactured article not specially provided for." The importer protested, claiming the goods to be properly classifiable as a crude vegetable substance under paragraph 552, or as waste at 10 per centum under paragraph 384, or as an unenumerated, unmanufactured article at 10 per centum under paragraph 385, of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Willits & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. Standard Varnish Works v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
  4. Koons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  5. Ishimitsu Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Masson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. Algodonera v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  5. Werner G. Smith Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API