Legal Opinion
Leo v. Board of Medical Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 1940No. Civ. 12279PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The Board of Medical Examiners has taken this appeal from a judgment of the trial court granting a peremptory writ of mandate requiring the board to permit petitioner, Sidney David Leo, to take the examination for a *491physician’s and surgeon’s certificate at the earliest available date.
Petitioner regularly filed his application with the board for permission to take the examination for a physician’s and surgeon’s license. The application was rejected by the board solely for the reason that it failed to comply with section 2193 (c) of the Business and Professions Code, in that it did…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Wines v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by9 opinions
- Perry v. ErlingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Bank of Alameda County v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Kennard v. RosenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- North Hollywood Marble Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Kauke v. Lindsay Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.