Legal Opinion

North Hollywood Marble Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1984No. B003787PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, P. J.

This proceeding in mandate presents a question of statutory construction as to whether section 489.220 of the Code of Civil Procedure allows or forbids a trial court, hearing a defendant’s motion to increase the amount of an attachment undertaking, to consider the probability that the plaintiff will not prevail in the action. Specifically, the question is whether the term “probable recovery for wrongful attachment” is intended to mean: (1) the total damages defendant will probably sustain presuming that the attachment issued on a meritless action or (2) that the trial court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Film Packages, Inc. v. Brandywine Film Productions, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. BuildSimHub Inc. v. Beijing Jianyi Investment Development (Group) Co. Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API