Legal Opinion
Kennard v. Rosenberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 10, 1954No. Civ. 4863PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
This is an action to recover for work, labor and services, in which the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs Kennard and Drake in the sum of $5,150 and in favor of plaintiff Wolfe in the sum of $1,200. Defendant appeals from the judgments entered on the verdicts and his principal contention is that the plaintiffs were required to be licensed by the provisions of division 3, chapter 11 of the Business and Professions Code, and not having complied therewith, were not entitled to recover compensation for their services.
Plaintiffs Kennard and Drake were both registered chemical…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- McMillan v. SiemonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Reuter v. Bd. of Supervisors of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Bakkenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Magill v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1958
- Goddard v. South Bay Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Golden v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- State of Nevada v. TatalovichNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Taylor v. Bureau of Private Investigators & AdjustersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.