Legal Opinion

Geier v. Richardson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1989No. 88-5155PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

The United States, an intervenor in an action seeking desegregation of public institutions of higher learning in Tennessee, appeals the district court’s order granting attorney’s fees against the United States in favor of original plaintiffs, individual intervening plaintiffs, and original defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b).

The facts of this protracted litigation are set forth in this court’s prior opinion, Geier v. Alexander, 801 F.2d 799 (6th Cir.1985). This action began with a complaint by several individuals seeking to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Charles v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Geier v. SundquistCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Johnson v. State of FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Seth Krichinsky, by and Through His Parents and Next Best Friends, Mr. And Mrs. Alan Krichinsky v. Knox County SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. Strickland v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Keener v. Department of ArmyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API