Legal Opinion
Keener v. Department of Army
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided February 8, 1991No. 3-87-0647PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN T. NIXON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is an action brought by the plaintiff’s attorney1 to recover fees and expenses incurred in his representation in the above-styled employment discrimination action. Also before the Court is a motion by the defendants for sanctions against the plaintiff’s counsel under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Upon the stipulations of the parties and testimony of each parties’ witnesses, the Court conducted a bench trial on this matter on June 7-8, 1990 and October 4, 1990. The Court has considered the record in this…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Imwalle v. Reliance Medical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- In Re BrentUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
- Norris v. Sysco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Williams v. Revlon Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.