Geier v. Sundquist
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J., joined by Spiegel, D.J.,
COOK, J. (pp. 796-98), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, the Geier Plaintiffs, appeal the district court’s judgment awarding them $376,587.50 in attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 for legal services performed in connection with this civil rights action — ongoing for the past thirty-six years — which led to the desegregation of Tennessee’s public higher education system. The Geier Plaintiffs contend that the district court abused its discretion in: (1) declining to award fees pursuant to the “common fund”/“common benefit” method; (2)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. HustedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Gonter v. Hunt Valve Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Garner v. Cuyahoga County Juvenile CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Russell CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.