Legal Opinion

Charles v. Daley

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 5, 1988No. Nos. 86-1552, 86-3137PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFEY, Circuit Judge.

Intervening defendants-appellants (hereinafter “intervenors”) appeal from two orders of the district court awarding plaintiffs-appellees (“plaintiffs”) an aggregate *1059sum of $312,842.20, of which $212,310.35 was assessed against various intervenors, as costs and attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The litigation underlying the district court’s fee award involves the plaintiffs’ nearly six-year battle in the district court, this court and the Supreme Court against the intervenors and various governmental officials of the State of Illinois to set aside S.B. 47, the…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Stephen Ustrak v. James W. FairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. John D. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Citizens for a Better Environment v. The Steel Company, Also Known as Chicago Steel and Pickling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. John A. Hyde v. Daniel Small and Bill HedgepathCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. James R. King v. Illinois State Board of Elections, David E. Murray, Lawrence E. Johnson v. Bobby Rush, Timuel Black, Al Johnson, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API