Legal Opinion
Seth Krichinsky, by and Through His Parents and Next Best Friends, Mr. And Mrs. Alan Krichinsky v. Knox County Schools
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1992No. 91-5880PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
The Krichinskys, parents of a handicapped child, appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for attorney fees under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1415(e)(4)(B) (1991). 1
Seth Krichinsky is a handicapped child in the Knox County, Tennessee, school district. After consulting an expert recommended by the school system, Seth’s parents requested that the school system place Seth in a residential program that would better meet his educational needs. Residential programs provide group-living situations with full-time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Angela L. B/n/f Mrs. Zeta L. v. Pasadena Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Geier v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kellee Jo Beard v. Julia Teska, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Phelan v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Hunger v. LeiningerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Daniel Payne v. Board of Education, Cleveland City SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Hunger ex rel. Hunger v. LeiningerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.