Legal Opinion
Isaacs v. Tull
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 1, 1928No. 18624PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.
The parties to this appeal occupy the same position here as in the district court, and will be referred to as they appeared there.
Suit was brought by the plaintiff against the defendants, Francis M. Tull and Clara M. Tull, for the sum of $10,000 for damages on account of personal injuries to the plaintiff, and the sum of $1,000 for medical and' other expenses incurred by reason of said injuries.
Trial was had to the court and jury, and' the jury returned its verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $10,000.
Motion for new trial was filed by defendants, and thereafter heard by the court,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Yarnell v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Kkk Medicine Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Hall v. PolsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Federal Surety Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Avery v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- American Nat. Bank v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Graybill v. ClancySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.