Legal Opinion

Yarnell v. Kilgore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 6, 1905PublishedCited by 31 opinions

'Error from the District Court of Caddo County; before Eranlc E. Cillette, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

This action was commenced by Thomas F. Yarnell, to recover for threshing for the appellant, who, by way of cross bill, alleged that Yarnell, while- threshing his grain, had, through the gross carelessness of himself and employes, permitted sparks to escape from the threshing engine and burned np his wheat, the value of which was alleged to be greatly in excess of the claim sued on. The jury found for the plaintiff, and the trial court, in passing upon the motion for a new trial -(ohe ground of which was that the verdict was not supported by the evidence)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. KunkelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Frick v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  3. Ireton v. IretonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Cherokee & Pittsburg Coal & Mining Co. v. StoopSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. ReardonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. White v. DougalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Jacobs v. City of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Rison v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Piel v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API