Be & K Construction Company, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
In this labor case, BE & K Construction Company (“BE & K”) petitions for review and the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) cross-petitions for enforcement of an order of the Board 1 which adopted with modification the findings; rulings, and conclusions of the Administrative Law Judge (AL J) that BE & K had violated sections 8(a)(3) 2 and 8(a)(1) 3 of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”). BE & K asks this court to vacate the Board’s modified order, arguing that the ALJ’s and the Board’s finding of unlawful anti-union animus is not supported by substantial evidence and is contrary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wright Line, a Division of Wright Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Florida Steel Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Beverly California Corp., F/k/a Beverly Enterprises, Petitioners/cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Thigpen v. United Parcel Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Progressive Electric, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Ross Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.