Legal Opinion

Baird v. Ocequeda

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1937No. S. F. 15677PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Defendants appeal from a decree foreclosing a materialman’s lien in the sum of $1332.97, including interest and costs. We shall not undertake to separately state and discuss all of the contentions urged on appeal. They run the gamut of objections. Defendants challenge the existence of any lien, the amount of the lien, the timeliness of the filing of the claim of lien, the sufficiency of the complaint to state a cause of action, the propriety of an order permitting amendment of the complaint, the propriety of asserted inconsistent allegations of the complaint as amended, the asserted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Epstein v. GradowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Merchants Collection Agency v. GopcevicCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Zinn v. Fred R. Bright Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. Coit Ranch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Niles v. Louis H. Rapoport & Sons, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API