Legal Opinion
Connette v. Wright
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided October 22, 1923No. 25573PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
In this suit, plaintiff seeks to recover one-tenth of the expenses incurred in developing certain mineral leases affecting lands in the parish of Claiborne.
Defendant being a nonresident, suit was instituted by attachment. Thereafter, by answer filed through his attorneys, defendant subjected himself personally to the jurisdiction of the court.
Subsequent to the submission of the case in the lower court defendant died, and his widow and executrix was made party defendant.
Rlaintiff’s claim as finally presented to the court amounted to $77,580.46.
The judgment of the district court condemned…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Geohegan v. Union Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Merchants Collection Agency v. GopcevicCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Borah & Landen v. O'NiellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Wilder v. NormanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Moody v. WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Custom Builders & Supply, Inc. v. RevelsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Succession of ButlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Sugar Field Oil Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.