Legal Opinion

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1945No. S. F. No. 17134PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Petitioner seeks the annulment of an award of compensation against it as the insurer of Carrico & Gautier found to be the general employer of the injured workman. The award also runs against the insurer of a company found to be the special employer. Petitioner contends that the evidence is insufficient to establish the general employment; that it was improperly joined as a party defendant; and that *280the claim, as to it, is barred by the statute of limitations. (Lab. Code, § 5405.)

Carrico & Gautier, hereinafter called Carrico, the petitioner’s insured, had a general contract to erect a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Matteson v. WagonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Independence Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Lewis v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Aguilera v. HeimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Dunham v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. State, Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API