Legal Opinion
Aguilera v. Heiman
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 2009No. B206790PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLIER, J.
Freddy Aguilera was injured on November 5, 1997. On April 16, 2007, almost 10 years later, Aguilera filed this civil action against respondents Robert P. Heiman, individually and doing business as Pegasus Properties (Heiman), and 2612 Montana Avenue Owners Association (Association). Respondents demurred to an amended complaint on the basis that Aguilera’s action for personal injuries was barred by the statute of limitations. Aguilera contended that the statute of limitations was tolled by his timely filing of a claim for workers’ compensation benefits against his unlicensed…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Intengan v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Scott v. JPMorgan Chase BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Mendoza v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- San Francisco Unified School District Ex Rel. Contreras v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Harmony Gold U.S.A., Inc. v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.