Legal Opinion
State, Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 1957No. Civ. 17632PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
On July 27, 1949, the employee was injured by exposure to parathion, a poison used in crop spraying. It was not until June 28, 1955, that he applied to join the state as a defendant, claiming benefits under the Subsequent Injuries Fund for compensation in respect to a preexisting eye condition which limited his vision.
The commission found a permanent disability of 69 per cent due to the spray poisoning (for which the employee had been compensated) and that this disability when added to the preexisting eye disability resulted in a combined permanent disability of 79 per cent.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Sutton v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Bulger v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Grant v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Kaiser Foundation Hosp. v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD.California Supreme Court · 1977
- State of California v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.