Legal Opinion

Outhwaite v. A. B. Knowlson Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 11, Calendar No. 36,318PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

In 1921, plaintiff purchased from defendant, a dealer in building materials, some stucco for use in building a home. She demanded Elástica, which had been recommended to her, and would not consider any other brand. She also refused to take Elástica unless she should get a 10-year guaranty with it. Whether defendant orally promised it would give her the guaranty personally or informed her the manufacturer would give it is in dispute.

The stucco was applied to plaintiff’s house. In November she complained that it had cracked. Representatives of the manufacturer and of defendant examined the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Foley v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1930
  2. Loxtercamp v. Lininger Implement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Snelling v. DineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Appalachian Power Co. v. TateWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Ventura Manufacturing & Implement v. WarfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Botti v. Venice Grocery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Adams v. Peter Tramontin Motor SalesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Frantz Equip. Co. v. the Leo Butler Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Dow Drug Co. v. NiemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Wade v. Chariot Trailer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API