Legal Opinion

Loxtercamp v. Lininger Implement Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 9, 1910PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Carroll District Court. — Hon. F. M. Powers, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for breach of an alleged implied warranty of a manure spreader. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

At the date of the transaction under inquiry the plaintiff was a retail dealer in farm implements at Carroll, Iowa, and the defendant a wholesale dealer at Omaha, Neb., in like merchandise, including the Kemp manure spreader, manufactured by a concern known as the Richardson Manufacturing Company at Worcester, Mass. Plaintiff gave defendant a written or printed order for a Kemp spreader, in which the only reference to a warranty or representation of quality is in the following words: “We agree to receive the following mentioned below and settle for the same on arrival by notes due as per…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brigg v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. First National Bank v. DutcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Blackmore v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. Alpha Checkrower Co. v. David Bradley & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Bucy v. Pitts Agricultural WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Anderson-Weber, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  2. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Dailey v. Holiday Distributing CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. MORRIS PLAN LEASING COMPANY v. Bingham Feed and Grain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Drager v. Carlson Hybrid Corn Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API