Ventura Manufacturing & Implement v. Warfield
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Plaintiff commenced the action to recover the sum of $1,967.50, and interest thereon, due on a promissory note, dated September 24, 1912, in favor of plaintiff and signed by defendant. In this note it was set forth that it was given in consideration of the sale by plaintiff to defendant of a “30 H. P. Pioneer Engine. ’ ’
The case was tried before a jury and judgment was entered in accordance with their verdict, as follows: That defendant was entitled to recover from the plaintiff the sum of one thousand five hundred dollars, paid by him on account of the purchase of the engine, together with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne, & Chicago Railway Co. v. RubyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance v. HinesleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- First National Bank v. DutcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- North British & Mercantile Insurance v. CrutchfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Luitweiler Pumping Engine Co. v. Ukiah Water & Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Pratt-Gilbert Co. v. RenaudArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. TondroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Mosesian v. BagdasarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.