Legal Opinion
Dow Drug Co. v. Nieman
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 1936No. 4983PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.
The defendant in error, Clem H. Nieman, was the plaintiff in the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County and the plaintiff in error, The Dow Drug Company, and the defendant in error, The S. Frieder & Sons Company, were defendants. The Court' of Common Pleas entered judgment in favor of Clem H. Nieman against The Dow Drug Company for $800.00, and against him in favor of The S. Frieder & Sons Company for its costs.
The Dow Drug Company filed this proceeding in error to secure a reversal of the judgment against it and Clem H. Nieman. by cross-petition in error, asks the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Smith v. Peerless Glass Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- James v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
- Ward Baking Co. v. TrizzinoOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Ford Motor Company v. Marvin R. MathisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.