Legal Opinion
Scheinman v. Zalkind
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided July 1, 1940No. 4333PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
The Examiner of Interferences of the United States Patent Office awarded priority of invention defined by the single count of this interference to the senior party Zalkind and upon appeal to the Board of *1355Appeals his decision was affirmed. Scheinman has appealed here for a reversal of the board’s decision.
The interference is between an application of Zalkind, filed October 16,1933, and an application of Scheinman, filed September 18,1936.
The inventions of both parties relate to collapsible filing cabinets which are made substantially of fibrous board. Both parties provide metallic parts such…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Curtis Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Plasti-Clip Corporation and Daniel Faneuf, Defendants-Cross Plasti-Clip Corporation and Daniel Faneuf, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants v. Thomas W. JuddCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- In re DelanceyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Mantz v. JacksonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Masciarelli v. FoersteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Titan Atlas Manufacturing, Inc. v. SiskDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012