Legal Opinion

Masciarelli v. Foerste

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 24, 1952No. Patent Appeal 5898Published

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge.

Appellant has appealed from a decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office in an interference proceeding awarding to appellee priority of invention of the subject matter embraced within a single count which reads as follows:

“1. In . a system for operating and regulating an electric discharge tube having thermionic electrode filaments, a source of alternating current, a transformer providing a closed magnetic core having two relatively long legs and two relatively short legs connecting the respective ends of said long legs, primary and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. HaymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. Mantz v. JacksonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  3. Long v. YoungCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  4. Scheinman v. ZalkindCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API