Legal Opinion
Titan Atlas Manufacturing, Inc. v. Sisk
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided June 8, 2012No. Case Nos. 1:11CV00012, 1:11CV00068Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES P. JONES, District Judge.
In this patent infringement action, following a so-called Markman proceeding, I construe as a matter of law the disputed claims of the subject patent.
I
The patent at the center of this dispute, U.S. Patent No. 5,879,281 (“the '231 patent”) is entitled “Mine Ventilation Structure” and is owned by Frank A. Sisk. Precision Mine Repair, Inc. (“PMR”) is the exclusive licensee of the '231 patent. In their First Amended Complaint, Titan Atlas Manufacturing, Inc. (“Titan”) and Strata Mine Services, LLC (“Strata”) request a declaration that the '231…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.