Legal Opinion
Mantz v. Jackson
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 3, 1944No. 4782PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office in an interference proceeding involving a patent, No. 2,213,844, to Harold A. Mantz, granted September 3, 1940, on an application filed November 10, 1938, and an application of Wilbur F. Jackson filed February 7, 1941, for reissue of his patent No. 2,201,399, granted May 21, 1940, on an application filed January 7, 1938. Jackson, therefore, is the senior party.
As originally declared, the interference comprised five counts corresponding to five claims in the Mantz patent, which Jackson…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hansgirg v. KemmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Avery v. ChaseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Holdsworth v. GoldsmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Field v. StowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Hess v. DreyfussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Knutson v. GallsworthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- In re ZurkoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Serge A. Loukomsky v. Hans GerlichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Dalton H. Pritchard and Alfred C. Schroeder v. Bernard D. LoughlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- In Re Mary E. Zurko, Thomas A. Casey, Jr., Morrie Gasser, Judith S. Hall, Clifford E. Kahn, Andrew H. Mason, Paul D. Sawyer, Leslie R. Kendall, and Steven B. LipnerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.