In re Delancey
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGakRett, Chief Judge
The application for patent, all claims of which are before us by appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States *761Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting them, is broadly entitled “For Heating Plants.” The specification states that the claimed invention “contemplates an oil fired furnace or heating plant of the type employing a boiler and used either for steam or hot water heating, or for supplying domestic hot water.”
It is said in the specification, but not defined in the claims, that
⅜ # ⅜ the heating plant uses a boiler of much smaller…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re DeLanceyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Scheinman v. ZalkindCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- In re SlyeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
3Cited by17 opinions
- Application of KamletCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- In re WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Application of Benjamin Gruskin, Deceased, by Irma Kelly GruskinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Application of Bernard HarmonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Application of Fred N. HillCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.