Legal Opinion
Curtis Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Plasti-Clip Corporation and Daniel Faneuf, Defendants-Cross Plasti-Clip Corporation and Daniel Faneuf, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants v. Thomas W. Judd
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 6, 1998No. 1998UnpublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
135 F.3d 778
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
CURTIS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PLASTI-CLIP CORPORATION and Daniel Faneuf, Defendants-Cross
Appellants.
PLASTI-CLIP CORPORATION and Daniel Faneuf, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants,
v.
Thomas…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Baker v. National State BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- BMR Gold Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Dofasco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Khalil v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Barney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.