Legal Opinion

Miller v. Pacific Shore Funding

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 28, 2004No. 03-1029UnpublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

David and Rosalie Miller and Chima Gilbert-Iheme filed a putative class action against Pacific Shore Funding, a secondary mortgage lender, and seven assignees in Maryland state court, which the defendants subsequently removed to federal court based on diversity of citizenship and the requisite jurisdictional amount. The complaint alleges that the defendants issued secondary mortgage loans with improper and excessive closings costs in violation of Maryland law. We affirm the district court’s dismissal of the complaint.

I

David and Rosalie Miller allege that on February 22, 2000, they…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Pacific Shore FundingDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  2. Moreland v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Miller v. Pacific Shore FundingDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002

4Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lamont Wilson v. Dollar General CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. Bourgeois v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  3. Windesheim v. LaroccaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Balt. Scrap Corp. v. Exec. Risk Specialty Ins. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  5. Master Financial, Inc. v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API