Legal Opinion

Miller v. Pacific Shore Funding

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 22, 2002No. CIV.S-02-569PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SMALKIN, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on a motion for class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, filed by the plaintiffs, David and Rosalie Miller (“the Millers”). In their opposition to the motion, the defendants, Pacific Shore Funding (“Pacific”) and GMAC-Residential Funding Corp. (“Residential”), tendered evidence suggesting that the Millers lack standing to bring or pursue this cause of action. Because standing undergirds subject-matter jurisdiction, see Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 102, 118 S.Ct. 1003, 140…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Henry Clay Tignor v. William C. Parkinson, Jr., in Re Henry Clay Tignor, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  4. Weiner v. Bank of King of PrussiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Heron v. StraderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Miller v. Pacific Shore FundingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  2. Nehmelman v. Penn National Gaming, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Hopkins v. Foothill Mountain, Inc. (In Re Hopkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  4. In Re Bostic Construction, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
  5. Nicholas v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API