Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This Court’s Opinion, filed March 10, 2011, and published at 636 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir.2011), is withdrawn and replaced by the attached Opinion.
With this filing, the panel has voted unanimously to deny Appellees’ petition for panel rehearing. Judge Pregerson and Judge M. Smith have voted to deny Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Holland so recommends.
The full court has been advised of the Opinion and petition for rehearing en banc, *883and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
Accordingly, Appellees’ petition for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Environmental Protection Agency v. California Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arkansas v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pud No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of EcologySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Friends of the Everglades v. South Florida Water Management DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Shiloh Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Maryland Department of Environment v. Anacostia RiverkeeperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Defenders of Wildlife v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.