Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 8, 2013No. 11-460PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

The Court granted review in this case limited to a single question: Under the Clean Water Act (CWA), 86 Stat. 816, as amended, 33 U. S. C. § 1251 et seq., does the flow of water out of a concrete channel within a river rank as a “discharge of a pollutant”? In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is “no.” They base this accord on South Fla. Water Management Dist. v. Miccosukee Tribe, 541 U. S. 95, 109-112 (2004), in which we accepted that pumping polluted water from one part of a water body into another part of the same body is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Shiloh Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  4. Maryland Department of Environment v. Anacostia RiverkeeperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Eastern Oregon Mining Ass'n v. Department of Environmental QualityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API