Legal Opinion

Pud No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 31, 1994No. 92-1911PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Petitioners, a city and a local utility district, want to build a hydroelectric project on the Dosewallips River in Washington State. We must decide whether respondent state environmental agency (hereinafter respondent) properly conditioned a permit for the project on the maintenance of specific minimum stream flows to protect salmon and steelhead runs.

*704I

This case involves the complex statutory and regulatory scheme that governs our Nation’s waters, a scheme that implicates both federal and state administrative responsibilities. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Environmental Protection Agency v. California Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Arkansas v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API