Pud No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of Ecology
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
Petitioners, a city and a local utility district, want to build a hydroelectric project on the Dosewallips River in Washington State. We must decide whether respondent state environmental agency (hereinafter respondent) properly conditioned a permit for the project on the maintenance of specific minimum stream flows to protect salmon and steelhead runs.
*704I
This case involves the complex statutory and regulatory scheme that governs our Nation’s waters, a scheme that implicates both federal and state administrative responsibilities. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Environmental Protection Agency v. California Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arkansas v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by206 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.