Legal Opinion

South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 23, 2004No. 02-626PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Petitioner South Florida Water Management District operates a pumping facility that transfers water from a canal *99into a reservoir a short distance away. Respondents Micco-sukee Tribe of Indians and the Friends of the Everglades brought a citizen suit under the Clean Water Act contending that the pumping facility is required to obtain a discharge permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. The District Court agreed and granted summary judgment to respondents. A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed. Both the District Court and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Roland C. Dubois and Restore: The North Woods v. United States Department of Agriculture, and Loon Mountain Recreation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. South Florida Water Management DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Severstal Sparrows Point, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  2. Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Friends of the Everglades v. South Florida Water Management DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Piney Run Preservation Ass'n v. County Commissioners of Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API