Krause v. Almor Homes, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The named plaintiff is a minor. Through his mother, as next friend, he sued to recover for injuries allegedly received as the result of the negligence of the defendants. The mother was also named as an individual plaintiff in the writ. In the second count of the complaint, she sought recovery for the medical and hospital expenses incurred by her in the treatment of her son’s injuries. Upon the trial to a jury of twelve, the court restricted the plaintiffs to four peremptory challenges on the theory that there was but one plaintiff. Thereafter a jury was impaneled, the case was tried and a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HiggsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Shiels v. AudetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Mourison v. HansenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Rutkowski v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Reid v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
3Cited by18 opinions
- Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Carrano v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Dzenutis v. DzenutisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. BillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Frank Perrotti & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.