Legal Opinion

Dzenutis v. Dzenutis

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 1, 1986No. 12817PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether this court should continue to adhere to the doctrine of parental immunity from liability for negligence to an unemancipated minor child who was injured in the course of a business activity conducted by the parent away from the home. We conclude that in the limited context of the circumstances presented by this appeal the doctrine no longer serves the purposes for which it was designed and that we must, accordingly, modify the breadth of our decisions in previous cases that have unconditionally endorsed parental immunity as a defense to a…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Dunlap v. DunlapSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Dolores Schneider v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Greater Hartford Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API