Rutkowski v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBurpee, J.
The first reason of appeal depends upon the refusal of the trial court to set aside the verdicts on the ground that they were against the evidence produced in the trial of the causes. The defendant asserts that the plaintiffs failed to produce any evidence of the negligence of the defendant. It may be admitted, as the trial court observed, that the allegations of negligence in the complaints might have been more exact, but in the absence of any objection by the defendant before the trial, they may fairly be interpreted to describe the negligence on which the plaintiffs relied. They produced…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Knight v. Continental Automobile Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Brown v. PageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
3Cited by22 opinions
- Slabinski v. DixSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Gorczyca v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Greene v. DiFazioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Wochek v. FoleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Lametta v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.