Legal Opinion

State v. Higgs

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 24, 1956PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, C. J.

On a trial to the jury, the defendant was found guilty of rape. From the judgment rendered on that verdict he has appealed. His assignments of error are numerous hut can he grouped in five categories. He claims error, first, in the court’s refusal to allow questions on the voir dire concerning possible race prejudice on the part of prospective jurors; second, in various rulings on evidence; third, in the denial of his motion for a mistrial; fourth, in the charge; and lastly, in the court’s conduct, which he maintains was so prejudicial to him throughout the whole trial that it constituted a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aldridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Pinder v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  3. State v. PotterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  5. Duffy v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. FritzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Dingle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API