Legal Opinion

Reid v. City of New Haven

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1947PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.

In this appeal by the defendant from a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs, it has assigned six errors. One assignment has been withdrawn. Another, that the trial court refused to give certain requests to charge, is not pressed. One of the requests contained an erroneous statement of the law; the others were adequately included in the charge as delivered. Two errors were assigned in the charge, but as no objections were made to it at its conclusion they present nothing for our consideration. Practice Book § 156; Svenberg v. Subotkouski, 133 Conn. 329, 332, 50 A.2d 441. Error was also…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mickel v. New England Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Nicholaus v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Mourison v. HansenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  4. Belchak v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  5. Svenberg v. SubotkouskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Ricard v. Stanadyne, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Commercial Union Insurance v. Frank Perrotti & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. Marshall v. Hartford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Krause v. Almor Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API