Legal Opinion
State v. Roy D.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 30, 2006No. AC 26218PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Roy D., appeals from the judgments of the trial court revoking his probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court imposed an unauthorized condition of probation and (2) he did not have notice that failure to admit to his offenses while undergoing sex offender treatment could lead to the revocation of his probation. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to our consideration of the defendant’s appeal. On October 11, 2001, the defendant pleaded guilty under the Alford…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BryantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. BRUCE T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. ShuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. ROY D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. Roy D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006