Legal Opinion

State v. BRUCE T.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 5, 2006No. AC 26553PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The defendant, Bruce T., appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly determined that he had violated his probation on the basis of his discharge from sex offender treatment for his refusal to acknowledge that he committed the acts that gave rise to his underlying conviction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the defendant’s appeal. On October 30, 1998, the defendant was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. State v. ReillyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. State v. PrazeresConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AltajirConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. State v. SantosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API