Legal Opinion

State v. Bryant

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 5, 2006No. AC 26243PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The defendant, Clinton Earl Bryant, appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him in violation of probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court abused its discretion in revoking his probation and sentencing him to eighteen months incarceration and three years of probation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following procedural history and facts are relevant to the defendant’s appeal. On October 18, 2002, the defendant pleaded guilty under the Alford doctrine 2 to possession of narcotics in violation of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. State v. DurantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. State v. CampbellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AltajirConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. State v. WorkmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. State v. BryantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. State v. BryantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. State v. PenderConnecticut Superior Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API